But is that correct? The adjective "racial" sometimes Whatsapp Mobile Number List makes a much stronger claim: it is not a qualifying adjective but rather a defining adjective. Capitalism is necessarily inherently racist. Forget China and Russia, they are latecomers to capitalism. Western capitalism is the prototypical version and has been racist from Whatsapp Mobile Number List day one (if we agree that there was a first day): always and forever racist.
Does this mean that Manchester in 1844, where, according to Friedrich Engels's description, all the exploited workers were white, was not capitalist? No, because those workers were producing cloth from cotton grown and harvested by black slaves in the Whatsapp Mobile Number List American South. That's true, but I'm not sure that's enough for a Whatsapp Mobile Number List necessity. Consider a counterfactual: if black slaves had not been available, the recruitment of Irish laborers would have started much earlier than it did. Capitalism would not have stopped its rise even if the slave trade had not taken place.
But the example of Manchester and the southern plantations in the United States suggests what we all now know: capitalism is a global economic system and depends on the exploitation of people of color around the world. Here, however, it seems clear Whatsapp Mobile Number List that the key issue is exploitation, not racism. Given global demographics, the majority of workers in any global economy will be people of color. Even in a democratically or socio-democratically regulated global system, most workers and most managers – the lower class and the ruling class – will not be white. In fact, what would rightly be considered racist would be the refusal of any transnational company to hire people of color.